News

Filter by:

Anita L. Allen delivers the William H. Timbers '37 Lecture

August 9, 2022

For the William H. Timbers '37 Lecture, Annita Allen gives a lecture titled, Privacy Law and Racial Justice. Two kinds of privacy law are in a state of disarray—the information privacy law we need in light of data gobbling Big Tech and digital life, and the decisional privacy law we need in light of the recent Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade. Focusing on race and its intersections with gender, this lecture will describe the far past and the likely future of legal protections for privacy and private choice.
[more]
Sonali Chakravarti, 2022 Timbers Lecturer, speaks on Chauvin Trial and Juror Impartiality

May 5, 2022

On April 28, 2022, Sonali Chakravarti, Professor of Government at Wesleyan University, delivered the William H. Timbers '37 Lecture.
[more]
Prof. Lee Epstein, Washington University in St. Louis, delivers Timbers Lecture

June 2, 2019

On Thursday, April 11, 2019, The Nelson A. Rockefeller Center hosted a public lecture with Ethan A.H. Shepley Distinguished University Professor Lee Epstein, who is a faculty member at the Washington University in St. Louis Center for Empirical Research in the Law.
[more]
Public Program: “Rights and Rites: The Supreme Court, Voting, and Marriage Equality”

February 6, 2017

The William H. Timbers ’37 lecture entitled “Rights and Rites: The Supreme Court, Voting, and Marriage Equality” featuring Professor Pam Karlan of Stanford Law School took place on Monday, February 6, at 5:00 p.m. at the Rockefeller Center.
[more]
Yale Professor Daniel Markovits on Economic Equality and Inequality

April 23, 2016

During a lunch with Dartmouth students, Yale Professor Daniel Markovits. “Things I care about most at the moment include economic quality and inequality,” said Markovits. “Inequality in the market has increased dramatically since 1970 and may begin to happen elsewhere in the world. My intent is to describe the situation we find ourselves in, show why its unsuited to being addressed by traditional arguments about redistribution, and articulate new arguments in the face of changing circumstances.”
[more]

Pages